Welfarism and Extra Welfarism in Healthcare : Which is More Appropriate for Resource Allocation Decisions in Health?

Authors

  •   Devarshi Bhattacharyya BDS, MPH (Epidemiology), MSc Health Economics and Health Policy, Winner of British FCO Office Chevening Scholarship 2015-16 from India, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2016/v5i4/100771

Keywords:

Health Economics

, Economic Evaluation, Welfarism, Extra-Welfarism

A12

, A23, I10, I18

Paper Submission Date

, April 10, 2016, Paper sent back for Revision, July 6, Paper Acceptance Date, July 20, 2016.

Abstract

As cost of health care is increasing around the world, resource allocation decisions need to be taken on the basis of explicit theoretical concepts. Health economics as an area of study specializes in guiding decision-makers to make correct decisions in allocating health care resources. Cost-benefit analysis and cost-utility analysis are two types of economic evaluation, which are used in taking decisions regarding healthcare. However, they are based on two different theoretical foundations, and so, it is imperative that the correct economic evaluation method is identified. While cost-benefit analysis (CBA) measures both costs and outcomes in monetary terms, cost-utility analysis measures outcomes in terms of a particular metric called quality adjusted life years (QALYs). CBA is based on the idea of welfare economics, while CUA is based on the idea of extra-welfarism. This paper described the theoretical foundation of both these methods and also highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of using both the methods. Finally, the paper concluded by arguing for the usage of extra-welfarist economic concepts in resource allocation decisions in health care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-01

How to Cite

Bhattacharyya, D. (2016). Welfarism and Extra Welfarism in Healthcare : Which is More Appropriate for Resource Allocation Decisions in Health?. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 5(4), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2016/v5i4/100771

Issue

Volume 5, Issue 4, July-August 2016

Section

Health, Education & Welfare Economics
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Bala, M. V., & Zarkin, G. A. (2000). Are QALYs an appropriate measure for valuing morbidity in acute diseases? Health Economics, 9 (2), 177-180. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(200003)9:2<177::AID-HEC497>3.0.CO;2-2

Birch, S., & Donaldson, C. (2003). Valuing the benefits and costs of health care programmes: Where's the 'extra' in extra-welfarism? Social Science & Medicine, 56 (5), 1121-1133.

Bleichrodt, H. (1997). Health utility indices and equity considerations. Journal of Health Economics, 16 (1), 65-91.

Boadway, R. F., & Bruce, N. (1984). Welfare economics. New York: Basil Blackwell Inc.

Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21 (2), 271–292.

Brouwer, W. B. F., Culyer, A. J., van Exel, N. J. A., & Rutten, F. F. H. (2008). Welfarism vs. extra-welfarism. Journal of Health Economics, 27 (2), 325-338. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.07.003

Coast, J., Smith R. D., & Lorgelly, P. (2008). Welfarism, extra-welfarism and capability: The spread of ideas in health economics. Social Science & Medicine, 67 (7), 1190-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.027

Coast, J. (2009). Maximisation in extra-welfarism: A critique of the current position in health economics. Social Science and Medicine, 69 (5), 786 - 792. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.026

Cookson, R. (2005). QALYs and the capability approach. Health Economics, 14 (8), 817 - 829. DOI: 10.1002/hec.975

Culyer, A. J. (1989). The normative economics of health care finance and provision. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 5 (1), 34 - 58. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/5.1.34

Culyer, A. J. (1990). Commodities, characteristics of commodities, characteristics of people, utilities, and the quality of life. In S. Baldwin (Ed.), Quality of life. Perspectives and policies (pp. 9 - 27). London: Routledge.

Dolan, P., Shaw, R., Tsuchiya, A., & Williams, A. (2005). Qaly maximization and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Economics, 14 (2),197 - 208.

Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Torrance, G.W., O'Brien, B.J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. New York : Oxford University Press, 07-14.

Folland, S., Goodman, A. C., & Stano, M. (2013). The economics of health and health care (7th ed.). New Jersey : Pearson Education Inc.

Hammitt, J. K. (2002). QALYs versus WTP. Risk Analysis, 22 (5), 985-1001.

Johannesson, M., & Jönsson, B. (1991). Economic evaluation in health care: Is there a role for cost-benefit analysis? Health Policy, 17(1), 01-23. doi:10.1016/0168-8510(91)90114-D

McIntosh, E., Clarke, P., Frew, E.J., & Louviere, J.J. (2010). Applied methods of cost-benefit analysis in health care (pp. 40-41). London : Oxford University Press.

Mehrez, A., & Gafni, A. (1989). Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy-years equivalents. Medical Decision Making, 9 (2), 142 - 149.

Mishan, E.J. (1971). Evaluation of life and limb : A theoretical approach. Journal of Political Economy, 79 (4), 687-706. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/259784

Mooney, G.H., & Drummond, M.F. (1982). Essentials of health economics: Part I - What is economics ? British Medical Journal, 285 (1), 949-950. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.285.6346.949

Mooney, G., & Russell, E. (2003). Equity in healthcare: The need for a new economics paradigm? In A. Scott, A. Maynard, & R. Elliott (eds.), Advances in health economics. Chichester, UK : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/0470867922.ch11

Morris, S., Devlin, N., Parkin, D., & Spencer, A. (2012). Economic analysis in health care (2nd ed). West Sussex : Wiley.

Olsen, J. A., & Smith, R. D. (2001). Theory versus practice: A review of 'willingness-to-pay' in health and health care. Health Economics, 10 (1), 39 - 52.

Palmer, S., Byford, S., & Raftery, J. (1999). Types of economic evaluation. British Medical Journal, 318 (7194), 1349. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7194.1349

Phillips, C., & Thompson, G. (2009). What is a QALY? Retrieved from http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/qaly.pdf

Rice, J. K. (2001). Poverty, welfare, and patriarchy: How macro-level changes in social policy can help low-income women. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (2), 355 - 374. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00218

Robinson, R. (1993a). Cost utility analysis. British Medical Journal, 307 (6908), 859 - 862.

Robinson, R. (1993b). Economic evaluation and healthcare what does it mean? British Medical Journal, 307 (6905), 670-673.

Sen, A. (1979). Personal utilities and public judgements: Or what is wrong with welfare economics? The Economic Journal, 89 (355), 537-558.

Sen, A. (1982). Choice, welfare and measurement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. C. Nussbaum (ed.), The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Weinstein, M.C., & Fineberg, H.V. (1980). Clinical decision analysis. Philadelphia : Saunders.

Wonderling, D., Gruen, R., & Black, N. (2005). Introduction to health economics (pp. 17-18). London : Oxford University Press.

Zweifel, P., Breyer, F., & Kifmann M. (2009). Health economics (2nd ed). New York : Springer Science and Business Media.